Author Topic: New banner like thing.  (Read 12281 times)

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
New banner like thing.
« on: April 18, 2007, 04:02:07 PM »
I can do one. D= Pwetty pweese.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline Florian

  • Administrator
  • More Common Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 838
    • http://geeq.at
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2007, 04:28:16 PM »
then do it ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Florian »

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2007, 11:58:02 PM »
=D Thankies.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2007, 12:10:45 AM »
This is so not double posting.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline nmn

  • Almost Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2007, 01:14:24 AM »
ooh, logo contest please! I spent a half hour doing this for fun:


without bg layer:


If the above appears to have a white background, your a fool. IE 6 and below sucks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by nmn »
Other places I go: Puyo Nexus | Digg | EmuTalk
Contributing to]Puyo Puyo! Tools[/url] | (Some other stuff that is yet to go public)

Offline Florian

  • Administrator
  • More Common Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 838
    • http://geeq.at
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2007, 04:06:28 AM »
the web2.0'y logos are invading! halp! :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Florian »

Offline nmn

  • Almost Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 155
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2007, 07:24:16 AM »
Speaking of which, you can do alot of the cool shadow effects in pure CSS on your current text logo. Though it varies (Looking coolest in safari, and because of which, probably konqueror) it is cool either way.

CSS could do the shine, too, but that really depends on a good implementation of it, and someone who knows everything about CSS...

Anyways, i like shininess. (But somehow, Vista does not appeal to me :P)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by nmn »
Other places I go: Puyo Nexus | Digg | EmuTalk
Contributing to]Puyo Puyo! Tools[/url] | (Some other stuff that is yet to go public)

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2007, 10:49:45 AM »
Fine, I'll do a non 2.0 logo. My logo took under 10 minutes ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline Tiptup300

  • Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2007, 05:48:30 PM »
Quote from: "nmn"
Speaking of which, you can do alot of the cool shadow effects in pure CSS on your current text logo. Though it varies (Looking coolest in safari, and because of which, probably konqueror) it is cool either way.

CSS could do the shine, too, but that really depends on a good implementation of it, and someone who knows everything about CSS...

Anyways, i like shininess. (But somehow, Vista does not appeal to me :P)


Its called Gloss not shininess
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Tiptup300 »

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2007, 09:53:05 PM »
Shininess is nothing compared to gloss. Really.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline Outrage

  • Is probably Booman
  • ***
  • Posts: 4120
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2007, 11:33:20 PM »
My kind of logo, in both 2D and 3D! :wink:

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Outrage »

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2007, 11:57:10 PM »
Still working on various images.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline Outrage

  • Is probably Booman
  • ***
  • Posts: 4120
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2007, 12:20:10 AM »
Quote from: "EmThree"
Still working on various images.


You have a spelling mistake :P

It's "destroy" not "destory"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Outrage »

Offline EmThree

  • More Common Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2007, 12:35:34 AM »
Argh, hate it when that stuff happens. Brb.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by EmThree »

Offline soulbreather

  • Lots of Free Time
  • ****
  • Posts: 2884
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2007, 02:47:19 AM »
my awsomenissnissification'd banner that we should definitly use, it dosnt have to be red but we have to use my shading and gloss affects:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by soulbreather »
blurby blurby blurbo
Quote from: \"kNova\"
;x Faptastic. KRISPY KREMES OOHHHH